Flutterby™! : Cost savings through preventative medicine

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

Cost savings through preventative medicine

2013-02-19 16:59:23.083175+01 by Dan Lyke 2 comments

Cost savings associated with improving appropriate and reducing inappropriate preventive care: cost-consequences analysis, Hogg, Baskerville & Lemelin. In southern Ontario, with 90,283 patients:

The total cost of the intervention over 12 months was $238,388 and the cost of increasing the delivery of appropriate care was $192,912 for a total cost of $431,300. The savings from reduction in inappropriate testing were $148,568 and from avoiding treatment costs as a result of appropriate testing were $455,464 for a total savings of $604,032. On a yearly basis the net cost saving to the government is $191,733 per year (2003 $Can) equating to $3,687 per physician or $63,911 per facilitator, an estimated return on intervention investment and delivery of appropriate preventive care of 40%.

Via a comment on JWZ: Blimpocalypse Continues. Terror Blimps: STAND DOWN., which pointed out that:

So how about this: converting to single payer health care in the US would save enough (e.g., by catching cancers at early outpatient-treatable stages instead of in emergency rooms at later stages requiring expensive treatment and long-term hospitalization) to extract all 10 petagrams of carbon output from seawater at $50/tonne?

(that last link is PDF)

[ related topics: Weblogs Health moron Economics ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

#Comment Re: made: 2013-02-20 00:21:45.342693+01 by: TheSHAD0W

I find it difficult to believe that insurance companies wouldn't have jumped on that same level of potential savings themselves. I suspect the numbers are wrong somewhere. (Either that, or the "single payer" is going to mandate behavior the insurance companies weren't allowed to.)

#Comment Re: made: 2013-02-20 00:56:32.91731+01 by: Dan Lyke

I think insurance companies haven't jumped on it because the people this would most save us from aren't insurance customers. So there's a good chance that the Affordable Care Act will get some of these people on the rolls through the coverage mandate.

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.