Quadcopters personal Drones
2013-06-13 02:31:42.913466+02 by
TC
1 comments
So this reminded me of Dan's fascination of air frames and my personal desire
to
have autonomous minions at my beckon. I thinks these would be a hit at a trendy
bar ...Airwolf brings your glass Chardonnay
http://www.ted.com/talks/raffa...hletic_power_of_quadcopters.html
[ related topics:
Wines and Spirits Consumerism and advertising Artificial Intelligence Aerial Photography Drones
]
comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):
#Comment Re: made: 2013-06-13 18:32:09.767808+02 by:
Dan Lyke
What most astounds me is that some pretty complex control systems are a matter of programming an Arduino.
That demo of the spinning platform with two damaged props was pretty damned impressive. A friend of mine is building an octo-copter because he doesn't want to drop a pricey digital SLR into the ocean when doing dramatic video shots along the coastal cliffs, and that platform can recover from 3 damaged rotors, up to 2 adjacent. But if you can have a reasonable chance of equipment recovery with just 2 remaining rotors...
And this also has some pretty cool implications for engineering survivability with equipment failure as we start to build human carrying quadcopters. Although, frankly, control systems are getting good enough that getting the humans further out of the control loop is a good thing.
We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your
comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel
they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine,
if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't
try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted
if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and
more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave
such ridicule in place.