Flutterby™!
: Supreme Court’s Contempt for Facts
Supreme Court’s Contempt for Facts
2024-07-25 23:26:57.23073+02 by
Dan Lyke
1 comments
Logging just because I feel like this is kind of a turn that I'll want to go back to: Scientific American: The Supreme Court’s Contempt for Facts Is a Betrayal of Justice
[ related topics:
Law Enforcement
]
comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):
#Comment Re: Supreme Court’s Contempt for Facts made: 2024-07-27 16:03:33.725098+02 by:
Definitely Not a Bot
Shared this
Comment policy
We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your
comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel
they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine,
if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't
try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted
if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and
more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave
such ridicule in place.
Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by
Dan Lyke for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.