Ebert's Top 10 Films
2002-01-03 18:56:46+01 by 
TC 
 6 comments   
 
Ok, I haven't seen half the films mentioned in his list but I may have to use his recomendations as a contrarian indicator. His list places LOTR on equal footing with films like Final Fantasy in the honorable mention category, sheeeesh. 
[ related topics: 
Movies 
]
comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):
#Comment  made: 2002-02-21 06:34:09+01 by:
Shawn
   
d00d!  Ebert's smokin' crack.  Those are the two best films of the year!
#Comment  made: 2002-02-21 06:34:09+01 by:
Dan Lyke
   
No matter what the criteria, putting Final Fantasy![[Wiki]](/adbanners/lookingglass.png) along side Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring
 along side Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring![[Wiki]](/adbanners/lookingglass.png) for any reason other than "spent a lot on effects" is kinda weird.
 for any reason other than "spent a lot on effects" is kinda weird.
#Comment  made: 2002-02-21 06:34:09+01 by:
Shawn
   
Why?  I think they've got a lot in common.  They appeal to/come from the geek-fantasy corner, I've been waiting three years to see each of them, and they (mostly) lived up to my hopes.  (Actually, FF more than LOTR - but who's splitting hairs ;-)
#Comment  made: 2002-02-21 06:34:10+01 by:
Dan Lyke
   
Alas, Final Fantasy![[Wiki]](/adbanners/lookingglass.png) didn't live up to my expectations, and I wouldn't sit through it again, but I'd conteplate a third viewing of LoTR
 didn't live up to my expectations, and I wouldn't sit through it again, but I'd conteplate a third viewing of LoTR![[Wiki]](/adbanners/lookingglass.png) , actively look forward to the next two, and think it was probably a better experience than the book.
, actively look forward to the next two, and think it was probably a better experience than the book.
#Comment  made: 2002-02-21 06:34:10+01 by:
TC
   
Hmmm FF met my expectation exactly. exceptional eye candy with with an uncompelling story and characters that are difficult to identify with. I say this as a person that has comlpeted FF VII & VIII am playing IX and will probably purchase X for my oldfashioned PS2. LOTR is in my top 5 movies of all time, sure I can pick on parts of it but found it to be a gloriously entertaining and can't choose which slot of the top 5 it merits because I am still in it's afterglow.
#Comment  made: 2002-01-04 17:41:02+01 by:
Shawn
  [edit history] 
Oh my.
Dan: I can't agree about LOTR being better than the book.  It was fun and entertaining, but I still felt that there were several points I would have done differently than Jackson.  Things that would have kept closer to the original text and yet still been appropriate for the medium and time constraints.
todd: I found the story in FF to be much more compelling than I had expected going in.  I was pleasently surprised - so much so, in fact, that we bought it on DVD.  The defining factor for me (all I had hoped for) was whether or not I was able to forget (at times) that this was an animated feature.  During several of large portions of the movie I was able to do just that.  I was exremely impressed overall.
I don't know if it has any bearings on my perceptions, but I've never played (or even see somebody else play) the games.