QOTD
2007-12-03 23:22:22.648344+01 by
Dan Lyke
2 comments
Rafe sums it up:
Some analyst group should do a study estimating the amount of money spent each year coding around bad technology choices imposed by business partnerships and outsourcing. The inefficiencies probably account for 1/3 of the IT jobs world wide.
I think he's optimistic, but damn he nails it.
[ related topics:
Software Engineering Economics
]
comments in descending chronological order (reverse):
#Comment Re: made: 2007-12-04 19:01:04.791082+01 by:
Dan Lyke
Elf has a little anecdote of such stupidities, from the era of Compu$erve's acquisition of Spry.
#Comment Re: made: 2007-12-04 01:55:05.843963+01 by:
meuon
[edit history]
I spent TWO hours in a paid for meeting this afternoon, listening to a client complaining about the same issues he did almost 2 years ago.. about an AS400 system that they 'own' but are essentially both locked out of and married to by the developers. A system that can barely FTP export their data. I told him I could replace the whole thing, get them out of a $2k per month support contract and a pending $2ok "upgrade" if he let me webify the whole thing for $10k. $15 if it feature creeps to where I expect it to. - They balked. I walked.
I think his estimate may be low.
We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your
comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel
they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine,
if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't
try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted
if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and
more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave
such ridicule in place.