How good are you at eyeballing?
2008-10-11 07:26:49.012335+02 by
Diane Reese
3 comments
I'm hoping that addiction to The eyeballing game will result in better performance. No evidence to that effect just yet, however.
EDIT: OK, maybe there's some slight evidence: I finally broke 4.0 and am now working on beating my 3.51 personal best...
[ related topics:
Games Theater & Plays
]
comments in descending chronological order (reverse):
#Comment Re: made: 2008-10-12 20:34:02.96431+02 by:
meuon
Did thrice, being careful: 4.5, doing fairly quickly.. swagging.. 3.6, with two 0.0 dead on scores. Trying hard to be accurate. 4.71
#Comment Re: made: 2008-10-12 01:09:57.103497+02 by:
Dan Lyke
Okay, second game I got 3.35, parallelogram still kicking my butt. And that's after a good ride, which always makes everything (except the parts of my butt used for sitting) work better.
I think it'd be easier if they used the same anti-aliasing technique for the interactive lines as they do for the static lines.
#Comment Re: made: 2008-10-11 17:41:32.343816+02 by:
Dan Lyke
Just one game so far, I'm not sure I want to share my scores. The parallelogram kicks my butt.
We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your
comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel
they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine,
if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't
try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted
if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and
more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave
such ridicule in place.