Flutterby™! : Valuing GM

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

Valuing GM

2009-06-09 16:22:40.312115+02 by Dan Lyke 2 comments

What I Learned Today: 0.000000435%. The U.S. Treasury has spent fifty billion bucks on GM for 60% of equity, implying a value of eighty three billion, but GM's all-time high in 2000 was fifty six billion.

comments in descending chronological order (reverse):

#Comment Re: made: 2009-06-09 17:43:00.604258+02 by: ebwolf

The conceit of valuing a corporation using simple market cap is too seductive. GM's value and significance to the general economy extends much deeper than it's peak $56B market cap. GM directly employs about 250,000 people. GM's operations also create the market for thousands of smaller companies. By comparison, solvent Ford is still only worth $20B in market cap.

GM's failure is due entirely to stupid management. While the company increasingly dealt with costly labor - retirement and health costs - it also saw a rapidly expanding market. Last year, GM sold over 1M vehicles in China - 1/3rd of what it sold in the US - and a market that didn't even exist 5 years ago. How can you have such fast market growth and still drop the ball so hard?

GM has an amazing potential value. Until recently, GM was larger than Toyota - which has a market cap of $124B. GM could be worth more.

#Comment Re: made: 2009-06-09 17:09:19.592793+02 by: JT [edit history]

I heard someone a few weeks ago bitching on Jon Stewart about the exact same problems with buying stocks from banks who were having issues.

edit: found it. It was Elizabeth Warren.

Part 1

Part 2

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.