First "abstinence only" sex ed program that worked
2010-02-03 05:21:08.452935+01 by
Dan Lyke
4 comments
An abstinence only sex ed program that works? This appears to be the first study which shows one doing so. From the abstract for Efficacy of a Theory-Based Abstinence-Only Intervention Over 24 Months:
The participants' mean age was 12.2 years; 53.5% were girls; and 84.4% were still enrolled at 24 months. Abstinence-only intervention reduced sexual initiation (risk ratio [RR], 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-0.96). The model-estimated probability of ever having sexual intercourse by the 24-month follow-up was 33.5% in the abstinence-only intervention and 48.5% in the control group. Fewer abstinence-only intervention participants (20.6%) than control participants (29.0%) reported having coitus in the previous 3 months during the follow-up period (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.90-0.99). Abstinence-only intervention did not affect condom use." ...
I haven't read the full text (it's there, it requires registration), but the NPR story says that this is very much not a traditional "abstinence until marriage" program, and that it focuses on how sex fits into "goals and dreams for the future".
So rather than preaching it offers the choice as a way they can have control over their lives. Hmmm...
[ related topics:
Sexual Culture Sociology Marriage
]
comments in descending chronological order (reverse):
#Comment Re: made: 2010-02-03 23:11:05.051717+01 by:
Dan Lyke
Further: In the MeFi thread it's pointed out that the difference is 9 people.
#Comment Re: made: 2010-02-03 23:06:15.40242+01 by:
Dan Lyke
The obligatory World of Warcraft-Abstinence mash-up poster
#Comment Re: made: 2010-02-03 22:34:18.156069+01 by:
Dan Lyke
Pick a couple of low income neighborhoods, there's your sample. The 33.5% who had intercourse within the next two years were probably pimped out by their step-dads.
And much beyond 2 years, 14 years old, and any "goals and dreams for the future" they may have had are largely toast.
#Comment Re: made: 2010-02-03 14:28:07.305234+01 by:
andylyke
[edit history]
Mean age was 12.2 years??? I wonder how long they worked to find
just the right
sample to prove their point? Maybe it was a few octogenarians and a bunch of 6
year olds?
We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your
comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel
they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine,
if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't
try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted
if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and
more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave
such ridicule in place.