Flutterby™! : Space-X to the ISS?

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

Space-X to the ISS?

2011-08-17 19:23:33.039925+02 by Dan Lyke 4 comments

Fuck the Space Shuttle: Space-X plans November 30th flight to the ISS.

(Thanks, Larry)

[ related topics: Aviation Space & Astronomy ]

comments in descending chronological order (reverse):

#Comment Re: made: 2011-08-20 01:41:39.601097+02 by: TheSHAD0W

Yup. Schoolbusses can still be lofted via big dumb rockets and then serviced by smaller vehicles.

#Comment Re: made: 2011-08-18 23:23:55.170627+02 by: Larry Burton

Space-X has given NASA a quote of $133 Million to deliver a fully loaded Dragon X capsule to the ISS. NASA's cost to launch the Space Shuttle was $450 Million. Space-X has stated if there are cost overruns Space-X will eat them.

Here's some interesting reading from the Space-X site.

#Comment Re: made: 2011-08-18 20:46:26.9989+02 by: Dan Lyke

I think the problem was that, aside from Ms. Frizzle's vehicle that can presumably get there itself, the need for a school bus in low earth orbit is minimal. The shuttle was an expensive way to get big heavy payloads into space, an SUV where we really need a small commuter car or a bicycle for a few decades 'til we can learn a bit more about how to get off this rock.

And the resources it sucked out of NASA meant that the far more interesting missions got pushed to the wayside.

#Comment Re: made: 2011-08-18 19:59:43.845083+02 by: andylyke

Neat. But can it deliver a school bus (or equivalent) to the ISS?

It seems to me that the existing shuttles were al built by private contractors, with coordination by NASA. Space X is now ready to deliver a Mercury capsule to low orbit. Think Yuri Gagarin. Shouldn't we be building on what we ha[ve|d]?

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.