Bypassing standard frameworks
2012-06-14 22:56:13.928025+02 by Dan Lyke 2 comments
Bypassing standard frameworks: fine. Using "username" and "password" configs when framework uses "user" and "pass": There. Will. Be. Blood.
2012-06-14 22:56:13.928025+02 by Dan Lyke 2 comments
Bypassing standard frameworks: fine. Using "username" and "password" configs when framework uses "user" and "pass": There. Will. Be. Blood.
comments in descending chronological order (reverse):
#Comment Re: made: 2012-06-15 13:31:35.960019+02 by: meuon
BTW, I was being a little sarcastic... In case ya'll missed it.
#Comment Re: made: 2012-06-15 04:41:11.72725+02 by: meuon
Yeah, cause in all of my worlds it is 'login' and 'passwd', like it should be. A user is a person or consumer of something, a user name is: "Bob Smith", but his login is part of the credentials used.
Which: one of my guys started using "Basic Auth" instead of some half backed cookie scheme of fake auth on a personal project. He finally admitted that it is easier and more secure.
We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.
Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by
Dan Lyke for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.