So wait
2013-05-15 04:26:13.885719+02 by Dan Lyke 2 comments
So wait, was the infiltrator also the bomber (again)? Is this what the DOJ is pissed at the AP for revealing?
2013-05-15 04:26:13.885719+02 by Dan Lyke 2 comments
So wait, was the infiltrator also the bomber (again)? Is this what the DOJ is pissed at the AP for revealing?
comments in descending chronological order (reverse):
#Comment Re: made: 2013-05-15 22:30:22.145679+02 by: Dan Lyke
Yep: https://www.techdirt.com/artic...oj-spying-ap-phone-records.shtml
#Comment Re: made: 2013-05-15 16:51:43.179269+02 by: Larry Burton
That's what it sounds like, and a British asset rather than a US asset. Trying to figure out what it actually was that got the DoJ's panties in a wad is making my head hurt. It sounds like the fact that the AP scooped them on announcing the operation might be all this is about.... or maybe the report embarrassed them in the eye's of the British who were probably the one's actually running the operation.
We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.
Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by
Dan Lyke for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.