Must read
2013-08-06 04:06:08.894887+02 by Dan Lyke 1 comments
Must read: The New Yorker on the stripping of due process that is civil forfeiture http://www.newyorker.com/repor...fa_fact_stillman?currentPage=all
2013-08-06 04:06:08.894887+02 by Dan Lyke 1 comments
Must read: The New Yorker on the stripping of due process that is civil forfeiture http://www.newyorker.com/repor...fa_fact_stillman?currentPage=all
[ related topics: Invention and Design ]
comments in descending chronological order (reverse):
#Comment Re: made: 2013-08-06 13:19:39.621657+02 by: meuon
One of the best pieces of journalism I have read in a long time. Thank you. I've had a couple stops like that in my life, and nearly dared them to try these shenanigans. Both of these types of stops were in rural Nevada. Being able to demonstrate resources, ability and intention (asking if I can call my lawyer..) like it'd be a fight changes their stance. We should not have to defend ourselves from the police. I've had a lot of interfacing with law enforcement, approx 9/10 have been positive experiences, even when I was wrong and paid a fine/ticket. The problem with activities like this, is it puts everyone on the defensive when pulled over, which changes the dynamics. It's bad for the police, it's bad for everyone.
We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.
Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by
Dan Lyke for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.