Flutterby™! :

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

2000-02-21 15:58:49+01 by Dan Lyke 0 comments

Gray areas of the law I've always wondered about get tested: "A Canadian court this week began considering whether live images of <link url="http://www.apbnews.com:80/newscenter/breakingnews/2000/02/16/netsex0216_01.html">erotic acts relayed over the Internet in exchange for money constitute prostitution</link>." The reason for the hullabaloo in the first place appears to be the lack of age restrictions that, say, a strip club can impose. I'm not a lawyer, but that doesn't sound like it's a legal basis for differentiating between performance and prostitution, that sounds like a bad excuse.

[ related topics: Web development Erotic ]

comments in descending chronological order (reverse):

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.