AGENTS.md: there to increase your costs
2026-08-31 18:14:50.517544+02 by
Dan Lyke
2 comments
Evaluating AGENTS.md: Are Repository-Level
Context Files Helpful for Coding Agents?
Surprisingly, we
find that providing context files does not generally improve task success rates,
while increasing inference cost by over 20% on average. This observation holds
across different LLMs, coding agents, and for both LLM-generated and developercommitted
context files. Specifically, we find that while instructions in the context
files are well followed by coding agents, repository overviews, although popular
and recommended by model providers, are not helpful. We conclude that while
context files are useful for specifying non-standard coding practices, any attempts
to improve performance should be rigorously evaluated before deployment.
[ related topics:
Software Engineering Theater & Plays
]
comments in descending chronological order (reverse):
#Comment Re: made: 2026-08-31 20:32:00.006256+02 by:
Dan Lyke
Oh snap!
This is one of the things I think about a lot in software: we do a crap job of measuring
productivity, and we adopt a whole lot of practices that make people (generally not the
actual developers) feel good, practices that I strongly suspect are shit for productivity.
I strongly suspect that LLM and "agent" use is such a practice, but I have no data, and no
way to gather data.
Only vibes.
#Comment Re: made: 2026-08-31 19:16:36.678876+02 by:
markd
> should be rigorously evaluated
Why start now?
We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your
comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel
they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine,
if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't
try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted
if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and
more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave
such ridicule in place.