Ashcroft v. Free Speech
2002-04-16 18:03:50+02 by
Dan Lyke
3 comments
Yay! Supreme Court strikes down ban on virtual child pornography. It's hard to tell from this article, it seems like they didn't make any judgements on the illegality of the act portrayed (which would have opened up some really interesting cans of worms), but this skirmish in the attack on overly broad speech restrictions seems to have gone in freedom's favor.
[ related topics:
Privacy Sexual Culture Civil Liberties
]
comments in descending chronological order (reverse):
#Comment made: 2002-04-18 19:28:00+02 by:
Dan Lyke
Linking: Good. In fact when I first put up the discussion system, my hope was that it'd be used for linking to longer commentary. I need to add verbiage to that effect.
#Comment made: 2002-04-18 19:02:21+02 by:
other_todd
They're not only awake, they're paying attention.
http://www.mouthorgan.com/cgi-bin/lisa?200204-002-000
('Scuse my linking that, Dan, but I'm damned if I'm going to write it all over again.)
#Comment made: 2002-04-18 06:00:12+02 by:
ebwolf
My god - the Supreme Court is awake!
We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your
comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel
they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine,
if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't
try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted
if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and
more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave
such ridicule in place.