Semi-new code
2002-07-30 04:59:24+02 by
Dan Lyke
9 comments
There's a bunch of new code, a stricter version of the HTML parser to catch some of the nesting errors the old one let through, but primarily a clean-up of a bunch of code to give the Flutterby content management system an install script which should improve performance, and maybe actually now let another person or two install it. Still a little work to do there, but the ferry ride is productive. Anyway, if you see problems post bug reports here or email me. Thanks.
[ related topics:
Content Management Flutterby Meta
]
comments in descending chronological order (reverse):
#Comment made: 2002-08-02 06:01:23+02 by:
Mark A. Hershberger
Where's the code?
#Comment made: 2002-07-30 19:49:30+02 by:
Diane Reese
And from personal experience, I can assure you that restarting the parents can sometimes be very difficult after redirecting the children.
#Comment made: 2002-07-30 19:04:55+02 by:
Dan Lyke
I guess I should add that the problem Diane was experiencing above came from me failing to... *cough*... restart their parents.
#Comment made: 2002-07-30 19:01:39+02 by:
Dan Lyke
No, you either have to remove their print statements, or redirect their output to /dev/null. Virtual duct-tape, if you will.
#Comment made: 2002-07-30 18:56:35+02 by:
TC
so you only niced them? I tried it with mine but it didn't work
#Comment made: 2002-07-30 18:48:17+02 by:
Dan Lyke
Didn't kill the children, just shut them up.
And... well... I was going to protest the second count based on them all being daemon children, but... well... if all children are demons I guess that doesn't narrow it down.
#Comment made: 2002-07-30 18:39:05+02 by:
TC
So I supposed Dan the misanthrope of mini-peoples killed all these children? hmmm ...hmmmmm? I know for a fact he has daemons enslaving children.
#Comment made: 2002-07-30 16:43:21+02 by:
Dan Lyke
Thank you. Apache hadn't yet reloaded a module that I'd munged up for debugging, then fixed.
#Comment made: 2002-07-30 16:10:16+02 by:
Diane Reese
There are a whole lot of children being outputted for data over there in the comments. Is this a manifestation of the new code? (Took me a few minutes to mull over the comment, "Outputting children for data" -- I wondered what pithy thing that was shorthand for. Until I noticed that gee, *everyone* was saying it today...)
We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your
comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel
they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine,
if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't
try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted
if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and
more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave
such ridicule in place.