2002-10-06 05:32:38+02 by meuon 6 comments
This is what keeps the Libertarians from being taken seriously: Blue Candidates for all the wrong reasons.... stupidity.
[Edit by Dan Lyke, June 2006: Candidate was "Stan Jones", http://www.billingsgazette.com...ild/local/72-candidate_large.inc http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/americas/2297471.stm and he turned blue from too much colloidal silver]
[ related topics: Politics Libertarian ]
comments in descending chronological order (reverse):
#Comment made: 2002-10-09 04:16:29+02 by: TheSHAD0W
I dunno if I'd vote for him. He's obviously a member of the Elders of Zion.
Yup, you guessed it. The man is Heblue.
#Comment made: 2002-10-08 17:28:39+02 by: other_todd
I sense that one person in this thread is sillier than the others. Of course, the original item is pretty darned silly anyway. Dan, the Gargamel comment nearly made me lose coffee out my nose.
#Comment made: 2002-10-07 19:41:01+02 by: mkelley
The media has it all wrong, he's a libluetarian.
#Comment made: 2002-10-07 18:41:20+02 by: Dan Lyke
So, of course, it occurs to me that I generally don't vote for the bluenoses. I wonder if he listens to Chicago or Memphis style when he's feeling blue? But we've made progress, I'll bet thirty years ago in Montana a colored person couldn't get even this much press coverage.
And has anyone reported catching him cursing up a blue streak?
#Comment made: 2002-10-06 16:49:04+02 by: Dan Lyke
And apparently he's suffering no ill effects. How do you know being blue isn't better, health-wise?
I mean, besides having to run from Gargamel all the time.
#Comment made: 2002-10-06 10:00:42+02 by: TheSHAD0W
Hey -- we libertarians don't discriminate on the basis of color. :-)