Flutterby™! : Stepper Control

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

Stepper Control

2003-01-09 20:15:02+01 by Dan Lyke 1 comments

A big "three cheers" for StepperControl.com and their S100SMC controller. I fired it up with the NEMA23NSM motor, cobbled together fittings for our equipment out of bits bent from a computer case, and a cut up soda can for shims, and it drives our rig. Yes, it doesn't allow curves for acceleration, just straight lines, but that ramping lets us move our load smoothly enough that we're not throwing clothing around, and relative to all the other vendors we talked to this board has saved us hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars.

Now that we've played with it, I think I'm going to buy one to automate some stuff on my model railroad, and Phil wants to build a multi-axis telescope mount. The only thing missing from their documentation is that the motor block connectors are not insulation piercing, you've got to strip the insulation yourself, and the center post of the power connector is positive. What a great cheap way to get started with motion control. Recommended.

Too bad that, unlike the great guys at StepperControl.com[Wiki], the manufacturers of the various cameras I'm looking at using in our system insist on NDAs that'd keep me from recommending one once I've had experience with it.

[ related topics: Photography Law Work, productivity and environment Machinery Cool Technology Trains ]

comments in descending chronological order (reverse):

#Comment made: 2003-01-10 17:45:15+01 by: baylink

You forgot a link on "our rig"; whatcha doin? I'm always looking for things that will let me build stepper driven camera platforms as smooth as Telemetrics'... for less than $25k a camera; is that the nail you're hammering?

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.