Roe v. Wade reopened?
2004-02-20 01:01:49.414991+01 by Dan Lyke 1 comments
2004-02-20 01:01:49.414991+01 by Dan Lyke 1 comments
[ related topics: Sexual Culture Current Events Civil Liberties ]
comments in descending chronological order (reverse):
#Comment Re: made: 2004-02-22 15:50:51.571772+01 by: Dan Lyke
In the comments to Columbine's entry on this, REM points out that this isn't really an "agrees to hear" thing, it's a procedural "has to have everyone in the courtroom so they can say 'no'" thing. So the article is probably just a rewritten press release from the anti-abortion forces.
We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.
Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by
Dan Lyke for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.