Flutterby™! : Kodak quits

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

Kodak quits

2005-06-20 16:44:33.689885+02 by Dan Lyke 2 comments

[ related topics: Photography Current Events ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

#Comment Re: made: 2005-06-21 14:24:12.868421+02 by: petronius

Although Ilford and Agfa claim to be supporting b&w paper, their financial difficulties would seem to make that assumption a bit shakey. And if darkrroom equipment becomes more of a niche market, certainly there will be no further technical development in that field.

I spent more than 20 years working for a ocmpany that produced training programs in radiology. We were perhaps the largest user of 35mm long roll b&w slide film in Chicago, since we could never get the correct contrast control on color film. I've had thousands of slides pass through my hands, and now Kodak doesn't even make Ektagraphic projectors any more. Its spooky how quickly (and quietly) this century-old technology has faded. It will also change so many ways of doing business, for example, big catalog houses like Sears and Wards would buy up entire production runs of color film from Kodak, to assure consistant chemistry in the emulsions, which changed slightly fron one run to another. Now color control has become the complete province of the PhotoShopper. We have moved from a direct chain of transmission from t lense to image, to utter manipulation at every stage.

#Comment Re: made: 2005-06-21 17:27:45.364238+02 by: Dan Lyke

I wonder if we're going to see a resurgence of home-made B&W paper. From what i've read of the middle half-century of photography, it's not that hard, and if you're into the processes of photography enough to have a darkroom at this late stage then there's not that much impediment to taking the craft from end-to-end.

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.