Flutterby™! : looking into the galactic core

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

looking into the galactic core

2009-05-19 22:59:18.632402+02 by Dan Lyke 1 comments

Who says you need long lenses to do spectacular astrophotography: Time lapse of the glactic center of the Milky Way rising over Texas Star Party (Via)

[ related topics: Space & Astronomy ]

comments in descending chronological order (reverse):

#Comment Re: Wide-field astrophotography made: 2009-05-20 13:45:21.362765+02 by: jeff [edit history]

That is just plain sweet.

I've always been an advocate of wide-field astrophotography. (Note: wide-field astrophotography has a different definition from wide-field traditional photography). If I lived where the weather conditions were better, I'd invest in a good motor-driven Losmandy mount and do it with my exisiting photo equipment. The Ohio weather is just too unstable, for the most part, though.

Here is the best that I have done with a single exposure:

Canon 20D, 17mm (EFL=27mm), ISO 3200, 20 second exposure, Mount Mawenzi, Tanzania. (Used rock for tripod)

You also don't need massive pixel numbers to have some fun. Here is a composite image that I made about six years ago using my old Canon D60 (6mp) DSLR, 400mm lens, 2x telextender (EFL=1280mm). I'd have to look at the original images to get the EXIF metadata, but I believe both Saturn and Jupiter had 0.5 second exposures (on a simple tripod). Since all (3) images were taken at the same focal length, one can get a sense of viewing scale from Earth:

You can also do very good wide-field astrophotography with lenses as small as 400mm (wide-field usually implies prime or piggy-back mounting and focusing, as oppposed to magnified afocal astrophotography). For example, here is what you can do with just 400mm of focal length (EFL=640mm), with a good mount and favorable atmospheric conditions:

It's ironic that the image above was taken with the identical standard photo equipment that I already own.

I just don't have a good motorized mount or good weather!

My favorite "amateur" astrophotographer is Russell Croman. His Earth-based work is truly outstanding:

I wish I were retired, and also lived where the atmosphere cooperated better!

(Dan: some of the images above are copyrighted. What are the rules regarding displaying them via URL references?)

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.