Too many men
2009-06-10 16:45:29.340287+02 by
Dan Lyke
4 comments
The Volokh Conspiracy: Surplus of Males and Runaway (with the Bride-Price) Brides. Looks at a book called Bare Branches: The Security Implications of Asia's Surplus Male Population
, by Valerie Hudson and Andre den Boer (2004), and notes that in general as women become more rare, they're treated more and more like property.
From a Columbine entry that you probably can't read.
[ related topics:
Books Sociology
]
comments in descending chronological order (reverse):
#Comment Re: made: 2009-06-11 01:21:15.743293+02 by:
TheSHAD0W
[edit history]
The Rainbow Cadenza
#Comment Re: made: 2009-06-10 22:26:02.886114+02 by:
jeff
Or expanding ones military with 32M displaced men? It's probably a good thing that we're not currently fighting a war on the Korean peninsula. "Hordes of Chinese infantry" would have taken on an entirely new meaning.
#Comment Re: made: 2009-06-10 19:33:01.951234+02 by:
Dan Lyke
Yeah, also makes you think some things about extrapolating this out to stuff like skilled labor...
#Comment Re: made: 2009-06-10 19:28:07.175269+02 by:
ebwolf
Interesting that rarity entails property treatment. This is exactly the opposite
of Heinlein's proposition it The Moon is a
Harsh Mistress in which scarcity of women lead to a matriarchal society.
We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your
comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel
they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine,
if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't
try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted
if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and
more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave
such ridicule in place.