Crystal Cox not a journalist
2012-03-30 21:11:22.529902+02 by
Dan Lyke
2 comments
[ related topics:
Writing Law Journalism and Media
]
comments in descending chronological order (reverse):
#Comment Re: made: 2012-04-04 00:57:25.465971+02 by:
Dan Lyke
The whole notion that we have a separate class of "journalist", with different sets of legal obligations towards disclosure and testifying and speech constraints, has always seemed weird to me.
I'm totally with you that most journalists today are transcribers and distributors.
#Comment Re: made: 2012-04-02 21:06:43.177993+02 by:
m
I have no comments on the Cox case, but if it is correct then there are very few journalists in the US. To be a journalist, according to the judge, requires investigation and distribution. Most of the people that we call journalists today are transcribers and distributors, and thus do not qualify.
We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your
comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel
they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine,
if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't
try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted
if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and
more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave
such ridicule in place.