2010-01-12 17:04:36.502345+01 by petronius 3 comments
A case reported by Professor Volokh: A man was convicted of forgery and possessing forgery instruments. The Forgery: a faked urine sample. The forgery instrument? Something called a Whizzinator. I was afraid to read further.
[ related topics: Law ]
comments in descending chronological order (reverse):
#Comment Re: made: 2010-01-13 02:20:31.117956+01 by: m
The Whizzinator has been around for years.
#Comment Re: made: 2010-01-12 22:15:11.23408+01 by: petronius
So, was the forgery just in using the Whizzinator, or was it in ordering an XX-large model instead of the more realistic "So-So" size?
#Comment Re: made: 2010-01-12 19:56:04.158464+01 by: Dan Lyke
I was actually aware of the Whizzinator (no, I'm not linking, you can google it yourself). It's basically a flesh colored dildo with a bag and a hose through the middle. As you'd expect.
Interesting way to prosecute that...