2010-01-12 17:04:36.502345+01 by petronius 3 comments
A case reported by Professor Volokh: A man was convicted of forgery and possessing forgery instruments. The Forgery: a faked urine sample. The forgery instrument? Something called a Whizzinator. I was afraid to read further.
[ related topics: Law ]
comments in descending chronological order (reverse):
#Comment Re: made: 2010-01-13 02:20:31.117956+01 by: m
The Whizzinator has been around for years.
#Comment Re: made: 2010-01-12 22:15:11.23408+01 by: petronius
So, was the forgery just in using the Whizzinator, or was it in ordering an XX-large model instead of the more realistic "So-So" size?
#Comment Re: made: 2010-01-12 19:56:04.158464+01 by: Dan Lyke
I was actually aware of the Whizzinator (no, I'm not linking, you can google it yourself). It's basically a flesh colored dildo with a bag and a hose through the middle. As you'd expect.
Interesting way to prosecute that...
We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.
Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by
Dan Lyke for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.